Hello, I’m an English teacher, so this blog post is about sex. All English teachers talk about in class is sex. Just ask any of our students.
Above is a photograph of the finish line of the most important marathon in which you’ve ever competed. That sperm that helped bring you into existence went up against ~ 250,000,000 competitors. You know that cloying cliché, “we’re all winners.” Well, in the case of conception it’s true.
The image below is an artist’s rendition of a comet or meteorite’s crashing into our planet, an occurrence that scientists believe set in motion the series of chemical chain reactions that resulted in life.
Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. William Wordsworth.
The world is too much with us; late and soon,
Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers:
Little we see in Nature that is ours;
We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon!
The Sea that bares her bosom to the moon;
The winds that will be howling at all hours,
And are up-gathered now like sleeping flowers;
For this, for everything, we are out of tune;
It moves us not.–Great God! I’d rather be
A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn; 10
So might I, standing on this pleasant lea,
Have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;
Have sight of Proteus rising from the sea;
Or hear old Triton blow his wreathed horn.
The world that Wordsworth laments in the octave of this famous sonnet isn’t the magical world he describes in the sestet. No, the world of the octave is the dreary quotidian world of getting and spending, the world of the long line at Food Lion where you find yourself because earlier at Harris Teeter you had forgotten eggs, so now you’re in bumper-to-bumper traffic headed home to a mailbox that holds a communication from the IRS. No wonder as you walk back to the house with that letter in your hand that you don’t notice the hummingbird hovering above the impatiens in the forgotten flower box.
Wordsworth, of course, was big on childhood. He believed in the pre-existence of the soul and that when children were born they brought with them traces of holy wonderment. “The child is father of the man,” he proclaims in “My Heart Leaps Up,” and “I hope my days to be/Bound each to each/By natural piety.”
Of course, what’s separating the Wordsworthian child attuned to the miracle of being and Thoreau’s wretched adult living a life of quiet desperation is school.
Get born, keep warm
Short pants, romance,
learn to dance,
get dressed, get blessed,
try to be success.
Please her, please him,
Buy gifts, don’t steal, don’t lift.
Twenty years of schooling,
and they put you on the day shift.
Bob Dylan “Subterranean Homesick Blues”
By the way, I’m not one of these people who grew up knowing they wanted to be a teacher. To the contrary, I couldn’t wait to graduate from high school, for the world of school for me was a factory world, very much like the world depicted in the above photo. Each class, though configured exactly alike in gridlike fashion, was its own little self-contained kingdom. No teacher ever wandered outside her dominion to help us connect the dots. For example, in geometry, when we were solving proofs, no one mentioned that we were also using deductive reasoning in the essays we were writing in English across the hall, which, in fact, might has been across the Gobi desert. School seemed random, a series of disconnected facts and skills taught for the purpose of preparing us for employment – the factory, the day shift.
Now, if ever there was a place that should instill in us a sense of wonder, it is a school. We should constantly be reminding our students of the mysteries of existence and how all the disciplines we teach are interrelated so that our students don’t end up like poor Charlie Kaufman, whom we’ll meet in the next chapter, a man leading a life of quiet desperation, despite the fact that he’s a bigtime screenwriter. This clip is from the movie Adaptation, written by Kaufman and directed by Spike Jonze. In the film Kaufman – who has written himself into the script – asks the existential questions, who am I and how did I get here.
Now, we’ve seen how Charlie got to where he is, but what exactly the odds of his having gotten there? We’ve established that each ejaculation yields approximately 250,000,000 sperm, but then we need to factor in 300 or so ova an average post pubescent woman carries. Humans have come up with a language that can compute these odds – mathematics, a sort of poetry in its own right – but what if we extrapolate those individual odds up the family tree to Genghis Kahn, and what if my great-great-great grand pappy hadn’t just ducked out of the way of that musket ball at the Battle of the Second Manassas – I wouldn’t be here in my this particular incarnation.
The odds of our existing are so infinitesimally small, it’s mind-blowing. The idea that we possess self-consciousness on a pebble swirling around a hydrogen explosion wheeling through a vacuum shouldn’t drowned by the mundane.
This is essentially the first lecture I delivered each year to my Honors tenth grade British Lit survey course when I was a teacher. To try reawaken student wonder of the world, I turned to mythology, and my guide was Joseph Campbell, he of the famous admonition – “follow your bliss.” I used the word mythology, instead of religion, because, I know all too well that another person’s religion is a mythology. However, as Campbell has eloquently demonstrated, myths are what make the world come alive for us, so each year, in British Literature, I began by talking about mythology and establishing science as the preferred myth of the class.
At first, students balked at the idea of science being a myth, but through the Socratic method, I led them to the idea that myths can be defined as symbolic configurations that attempt to explain the mysteries of Being – Being with a capital B – how the universe came to be and how we came to be. I stressed, however, that although myths are not literally true, they can be metaphorically true.
But science is literally true they claimed.
Well, I said, let’s hop into my time machine.
The year is 1970, and I’m in Mrs. Ballard’s physics class. There I am center-right standing, tilting towards a desk (obviously, Mrs. Ballard’s classroom management left something to be desired). Anyway, Mrs. Ballard asks, “What do we call the smallest component of an atom,” and my hand shoots up. “A quark!” I proclaim. Mrs. Ballard frowns. “No Rusty,” she explains, “we’ve been over this time and time again. An electron is the smallest particle of an atom.”
Actually, though, I’m right. Quarks are smaller than electrons, but in 1970, they hadn’t made their way into science books. By the way, Murray Gell-Mann, the discoverer of the quark didn’t know what to call it until he ran across the word in James Joyce’s Finnegan’s Wake, a novel so difficult it makes quantum mechanics seem like child’s play.
Three quarks for Muster Mark!
Sure he hasn’t much of a bark
And sure any he has it’s all beside the mark.
But O Wreneagle Almighty, wouldn’t un be a sky of a lark
To see that old buzzard whooping about for runs shirt in the dark
And he hunting round for runs speckled trousers around by Palmerstown Park?
Hohohoho, mounty Mark!
Of course, we could take this idea of science not being literally true back even further to Aristotle who had scholars convinced for two thousand years that the earth was the center of the solar system.
However, science does possess a significant advantage over older myths because it’s self-correcting, and that’s why it was the chosen myth of my British literature class. I found myself needing to establish this standard because in past years I had had folks who took the Genesis myth literally, wasting class time challenging Darwin, whose theories had created a crisis of faith in Victorian England, a crisis that profoundly affected Victorian poetry and fiction. In Wordsworth at the turn of the 19th century nature is paradisal; in Hardy you can hear the shriek of the raptors; nature is coldly indifferent to him.
So on the first full day of class, I offered my students a history of the universe from the Big Bang to the present, according to the myth of science. In doing so, I hoped to engender in them a sense of wonder, but also to underscore the importance of science, how it is central in understanding the mechanics of the world, and how it informs the other disciplines they study. I had a timeline that ran from left to right at the top of one of my white boards board, starting with the Big Bang. The only two historical events (i.e. non-biological) I had listed on the timeline were the discovery of agriculture and the detonation of the hydrogen bomb at Hiroshima, eye-blinks apart in our species’ past. I would choose a student and ask her to plot the Eden myth on the timeline. Of course, it comes after agriculture, right before Hiroshima. Adam’s curse was farm labor.
But what about the older myths – how can they be true? Obviously the Greek myths are mere fantasy.
Well, let’s take a peek at the Greek creation story – Uranus the Sky mated with Gaea the earth to produce the first living creatures, which is more or less the current scientific theory a comet (sky sperm) impregnates earth to produce life. See, it’s true! The Greek creation myth and the scientific creation myth are essentially the same.
Students love connections like this – love the integration of our disciplines, and, of course, what happens in outside of the realm of literature affects literature and the rest of the arts. After Freud, the novel goes inward; after the invention of the camera, painting goes abstract; after Planck, poetry goes atomistic.
So, the more we can cross-pollinate across the curriculum, the more engaged our students will become, and the more connections they’re able to make, the more likely school will be a positive experience for them, and not the drag that Wordsworth bemoans.
4 thoughts on “Channeling Joseph Campbell”
How did Planck make poetry go atomistic since he was not a poet? Did poets have to make adjustments according to his work?
Apparently, he finished his PhD at 21, titling his doctoral dissertation “On the Second Law of Thermodynamics,” the law that states entropy always increases. I just read an interesting article that stated how entropy was the “gateway drug that got Max Planck so hooked on physics, it led him straight to the hard stuff: quantum mechanics.”
Good question, Rodney. It’s not that he personally made poetry go atomistic but that art is affected by cultural events. Check out this poem:
by Martin Zarrop
Plötzensee Prison, Berlin, January 1945
He didn’t want it, you know, this universe
of fragmentation. He didn’t even like the atom.
Ultimately it will have to be abandoned
in favour of continuous matter, he insisted.
In his dark suit, starched white shirt
and black bow tie, he looked like a Prussian
civil servant but for the penetrating eyes
under the huge dome of his bald head.
He yearned for the certainties of the past
but the century splintered into relativity,
Schrödinger’s Cat, the possibility
of a state between life and death.
We went for a walk in the Grunewald Forest.
I was seven years old and he was full of joy:
Today I have made a discovery
as important as that of Newton
but he hoped the quantum would vanish.
Father, look closely at the world.
The rules have been broken;
there is no going back.
That’s a good one. Eerie. Quantum physics has probably driven many scientists to the brink of insanity.
I’ve been noticing how mechanical words are lately. It makes me wonder if knowing how they fit together can give you some insight into unlocking some of the universe’s most coveted secrets.